Name: Loach
Rating: 4.8 (24 reviews)
Author: Loach

Quantive Results (formerly Gtmhub) is a genuinely powerful enterprise OKR platform — 175+ integrations, advanced analytics, and alignment features built for organizations running goals across dozens of teams. But that power is exactly why teams go looking for alternatives: custom pricing that requires a sales conversation, a steep learning curve, and a feature set that overwhelms any company smaller than the enterprises it was designed for.

We tested the leading alternatives hands-on. Here are the 7 best, organised by who each one actually fits.

The short version

Startups and scale-ups: Loach or Tability. Mid-market with strategy focus: Perdoo or Mooncamp. Staying enterprise: Profit.co or Cascade. Microsoft Teams shops: Teamflect.

Why Teams Leave Quantive

Across reviews and our own testing, the same three reasons come up:

The pricing conversation. No public pricing, sales process required, and costs that make sense at 500 seats but not at 30.
Implementation weight. Quantive rollouts take weeks to months. Teams that just want to run quarterly OKRs with weekly check-ins are buying a platform when they needed a tool.
Complexity in daily use. The interface serves analysts and strategy officers well; the average team member updating a key result finds it overwhelming.

If those aren't your problems, Quantive may be the right tool — this list is for the teams where they are.

1. Loach — Best for Startups & Scale-ups

Loach takes the opposite approach to Quantive: instead of maximum analytical power, it optimises for the weekly habit that makes OKRs actually work. Quarterly OKRs get broken into weekly priorities, so every Monday the team knows exactly what moves which key result.

Pricing: First 5 users free forever, then €2.99/user/month — no sales call, no demo required.

Pros: Set up in under 30 minutes; weekly planning view connects OKRs to actual work; transparent pricing at roughly a tenth of enterprise cost.

Cons: No integration ecosystem like Quantive's 175+ apps; fewer enterprise governance features.

Switch if: you're under ~100 people and the Quantive machinery is more than you need. Full Quantive vs Loach comparison →

2. Perdoo — Best for Strategy-Driven Mid-Market

Perdoo combines OKRs with KPIs and strategy maps, giving leadership a visual line from mission to metrics. It's the closest thing to "Quantive-lite" — real strategic tooling without enterprise implementation weight.

Pricing: Free up to 5 users, paid from ~€8/user/month.

Pros: Excellent strategy mapping; KPI + OKR in one place; established platform.

Cons: KPIs can crowd out OKRs in practice; learning curve for the strategy features.

3. Tability — Best for Metrics-Driven Teams

Tability focuses on lightweight progress tracking with automated check-ins and AI-assisted goal drafting. The UI is the best-looking in the category.

Pricing: From $6/user/month; trial requires a credit card.

Pros: Beautiful interface; automated check-in reminders; good AI features.

Cons: Navigation gets overwhelming as usage deepens; no free tier.

4. Mooncamp — Best for Visual-First European Orgs

Mooncamp offers clean OKR management with strong strategy visualisation, popular with European mid-market companies.

Pricing: From €6/user/month, 14-day trial.

Pros: Beautiful alignment maps; GDPR-friendly European hosting; solid Slack/Teams integrations.

Cons: Cluttered onboarding; limited free option.

5. Profit.co — Best Enterprise Alternative

If you're leaving Quantive but staying enterprise, Profit.co offers comparable depth — weighted key results, KPI tracking, performance management — often at a lower negotiated price point.

Pricing: Custom (sales process, like Quantive).

Pros: Feature depth rivals Quantive; strong governance and review features.

Cons: Same complexity problem; slow interface; you're trading one enterprise rollout for another.

6. Teamflect — Best for Microsoft Teams Organizations

Teamflect runs OKRs, feedback, and reviews natively inside Microsoft Teams — if your company lives in Teams, adoption friction nearly disappears.

Pricing: Free up to 10 users, then from $7/user/month.

Pros: Deepest Teams integration in the category; generous free tier; includes 360° feedback.

Cons: Requires Microsoft 365; less useful outside the Microsoft ecosystem.

7. Weekdone — Best for Weekly Reporting Cadence

Weekdone pairs OKR tracking with structured weekly status reporting (PPP: plans, progress, problems). It's been around since 2013 and the cadence-first philosophy is genuinely different.

Pricing: Free up to 3 users, then from $10/user/month.

Pros: Weekly reporting built into the core; good engagement statistics.

Cons: Dated, cluttered interface; per-user price is high for what it is.

How to Choose

Match the tool to your size, not your ambitions. The most common mistake we see is a 40-person company buying enterprise tooling for the org chart they hope to have. Buy for the next 12 months.

Weight the weekly experience over the feature list. OKR tools fail through abandonment, not missing features. Whichever tool you shortlist, test what a Monday morning looks like for a regular team member — that experience decides adoption.

Check the exit before you enter. Quantive taught many teams this lesson: ask any vendor how you export your OKR history before you commit.

For the full market overview beyond Quantive alternatives, see our hands-on review of the 15 best OKR software tools, or our detailed Quantive alternative comparison.

Related resources:

Best OKR Software: 15 Tools Tested — The full category comparison
Quantive vs Loach — Head-to-head feature and pricing comparison
OKR Software Pricing Guide — What every tool actually costs
OKR Software for Startups — Startup-specific selection criteria

Leaving enterprise complexity behind? Try Loach free →